BLOG 5 Personal Learning Networks in Education

After watching Incorporating&Accounting for Social Media in Education by Harry Dyer, I realized that we often treat social media as extracurricular learning. If we don’t understand something, we can search online and even watch instructional videos. In other words, it has long influenced people’s learning. In this way, students will not only learn from the classroom, but also from short video analysis, extracurricular communication and discussion, as well as online communities. Then, it should be noted that we need to purposefully bring social media into education, which requires purposeful design: clear purpose, boundary setting, and accountability. Couros mentioned that PLN is a learning network that you actively establish, relying on connections, participation, and sharing for continuous learning, rather than simply brushing content (Couros, 2010). This is important for professional identity, as teachers are not only learners of PLN, but also role models for students on how to responsibly participate in the network.

Platform selection depends on learning objectives

If you ask which platforms are most helpful for education, I don’t think there is an absolute correct answer to this question. It depends more on what kind of learning experience you want. YouTube is very suitable for explanation and demonstration. For some knowledge that requires image changes, we need more intuitive representation methods to understand the content. For example, in computer science, logical expressions cannot be intuitively expressed with simple words and sentences. We need displacement animations to display logical changes. Of course, this may also lead people to only follow the teaching direction of the recommended videos, resulting in a shallow understanding of the knowledge points, so we need to watch more videos to learn. In contrast, course forums or more structured platforms (such as Brightspace or Teams discussion areas) are often more aligned with teaching objectives because they are easier to manage and less likely to get out of control. From the perspective of PLN, platforms that are truly suitable for education typically possess these characteristics: trustworthy knowledge, interactive questioning, and support for continuous learning and reflection (Couros, 2010).

The professionalism and regulations for vulnerable sectors will become stricter

In fact, when educational work involves vulnerable sectors (such as minors), the boundaries of social media will be blurred. Teachers have power but are subject to supervision and responsibility, so even a casual interaction may be considered inappropriate due to differences in identity and age. In this situation, the professionalism of teachers is no longer about speaking politely, but about protecting students’ privacy and trust. So, this means being more careful, such as avoiding private chats, prioritizing the use of official platforms to keep communication open and transparent if necessary, and complying with school policies. From this perspective, PLN essentially encourages a relaxed way of communication, but when facing vulnerable groups, it is necessary to maintain certain boundaries no matter what. So treat social media as a learning resource and public communication tool, rather than a place to establish personal relationships.

References

Couros, A. (2010). Developing personal learning networks for open and social learning. In G. Veletsianos (Ed.), Emerging technologies in distance education (pp. 109–128). Athabasca University Press.

Course YouTube Channel. (n.d.). Incorporating & accounting for social media in education [Video].

2 Comments

  1. I think your blog post is very clear, especially when you mention how we’ve grown accustomed to treating social media as a learning resource—that rings true. Much learning does happen outside the classroom nowadays, whether through YouTube or online discussion forums, which echoes Harry’s point about the “blurring of online and offline boundaries.” I also agree that platform selection should depend on learning objectives. Different platforms suit different learning styles, though it might be worth considering how students can move beyond passively consuming recommended content to truly deepen their understanding of knowledge.

  2. I really liked your point that platform selection depends on learning objectives rather than there being one “best” platform. Your example about YouTube supporting visual explanations in computer science was especially clear. It made me think about how intentional design is just as important as the tool itself. I also appreciate how you connected this to professionalism when working with vulnerable groups.

Comments are closed.